Monday, June 13, 2011

"Buster Posey Injury, Instant Replay, and collisions at the Plate.... The New Age of Baseball"

I am sure the baseball purists are going to attempt to hack this one up with a machete, but I am sorry to inform those people that their day is done. Baseball is (attempting) to enter the 21st century. Word on the street is that there is even some revolutionary technology which allows officiating crews to make accurate calls with almost absolute 100% accuracy. Such technology should be debated and beat to a pulp, argued over, and blogged about. I mean come on, in a sport which billions of dollars is involved, why would you want the correct call made when you can have the "human element" of the game make a billion dollar mistake? Instant replay is a positive thing, and the new age of baseball needs to get over its ancient historic self and get on board. Every other sport has incorporated instant replay in some format, and I declare all instances successful. The increased length of the game argument is nonsense, and absolutely untrue. MLB, get instant replay into games immediately.

The next advancement past the dark ages is the MLB rule (policy, concept, etc) of collisions at home plate. Unfortunately, as all too often the case, someone must suffer to cause change. That person is Buster Posey. A young, very promising catcher for the San Francisco Giants, Posey was plowed into at home plate, snapping his leg like a twig. Posey's season is over, and the outlook is grim for the Giants as well. Don't get me wrong, Posey is not an innocent victim. He came up playing the catcher position, and undoubtedly took several home plate collisions. He should know how to position himself safely for this violent play. This time, Posey decided to essentially kneel down and lay back over his legs to block the runner from touching home plate. The result was gut wrenching, will undoubtedly change the Giants season, and could possibly alter the career of one of the most exciting up and coming players in baseball. The play by Scott Cousins was 100% legal, was in no way illegal, and I do not condemn him whatsoever. My issue is with the rule which allows collisions at the plate. There is no reason for this play, and baseball needs to eliminate it. Baseball is a one on one sport for the most part, with bits and pieces of team play in the field. It is non-contact, non-aggressive sport, at least not in the way other sports such as hockey and football are. No other player in the field is allowed to bump an opposing player, charge, or make any form of aggressive action during the game. There is no reason to have baseball players running full speed, full contact into a non moving player, who's first objective is to catch a ball coming towards him from a completely different direction. It is unsafe, careless, and is just leaving a window open for serious injury. The NFL and the NHL have both made extremely significant strides towards protecting their players by eliminating headshots, hits to defenseless players, and head to head hits. They have done this by fining, penalizing, and suspending their players for such actions. These sports are popular because of their violent nature, and they glorify it, yet they have realized steps were necessary to protect its athletes from serious injury. MLB does not even need to punish their players, they simply need to make an adjustment to an obscure curious rule from the past. I like to see a good collision at the plate as much as anyone, but to see a Ryan Howard or Lance Berkman charging full speed into the bodies of 200 pound catchers with the intention of dislodging the ball causes me to squirm a bit. Take one look at the Buster Posey video, and you can see the potential harm. A big argument I hear is that these catchers have so much equipment on, that it doesn't matter. Another ridiculous argument. The catcher's equipment is designed to protect him from 95 mph fastballs being deflected in 1/20th of a second in a direction physically impossible for a human to react to. It is not designed for, and in no way does it protect them from physical collisions. The NFL and the NHL's players are the most protected (as far as equipment) of any sport, and yet they have taken the aforementioned steps to protect their players.

Using the Posey play as an example, I would have felt the same excitement had Cousins taken a wide angle and tried to make an athletic play into home, while watching Posey (not on his knees in such a horrid position) make a catch and try to bring the glove across on top of Cousins. Anyone who has played baseball knows that this is not an easy play to make, and would have had a much better outcome for the "defenseless player" that in this case is the catcher. MLB, make this change now, and take a step into the new age. Hopefully then we will not need to see another terrific athlete like Buster Posey in a cast attempting to recover and save his career at age 24 after a lifetime of hard work.

2 comments:

  1. I disagree completely. First of all, a catcher who is "intentionally" blocking the plate is in no way "defenseless". They put themselves into this position and are responsible for the risk. If anything should be changed, it should be that catchers are unable to "block" the plate. You simply can not ask a runner going full speed to go around a catcher. Defensive players are not allowed to obstruct the path of the baserunner, so really this should not be allowed at home plate either. It is really unnecessary for a catcher to risk getting injured to avoid giving up a run in the month of May. This is more an indictment of Posey making a poor decision than it is an issue in baseball.

    As for the instant replay argument that has been going on for years, I can see it both ways. It is frustrating to see when play at the plate is called incorrectly or a player is called safe at first (especially when it erases a no-hitter). But the problem is regulating it. One thing you can not do is use it for calling balls and strikes, Unfortunately, a poor ball/strike call could be more crucial to the game outcome than a play at first base, so there is no way to balance when replay will be used. While an incorrect call in the NFL can literally mean the season for a team, the MLB season is 162 games and the postseason series' are 5-7 games, so one call is not a season changer.

    ReplyDelete
  2. My bad for not making that point clear, Erd. I agree with what you said for the most part as well. I simply addressed the catcher collision at the plate and not the aspect of the catcher blocking the plate. I think they need to get rid of that rule entirely, and make it like the rule for the other 3 bases. A catcher should not be allowed to block home plate at all. Posey is most definitely at some fault for his injury, since he was essentially laying in front of the plate. Dumb move on his part. MLB needs to make a rule against blocking of the plate AND collisions at the plate... I was simply taking into account both situations without actually saying it. However, there are several times when the catcher is "defenseless". A play where the catcher is focusing on catching a bad throw near the plate (not allowing them to block the plate or get in a good position), yet the runner takes out the catcher who is not in an athletic position. This was the situation I was referring to when saying they were defenseless, not the Posey play. My other point with the NFL is that wide receivers go across the middle, they play a contact sport, they EXPECT to get hit (hard), and yet the NFL has deemed them "defenseless" at certain points.... so the MLB undoubtedly can take this spin on the term.


    On instant replay, definitely agree that balls/strikes are left to the umpire, no replay allowed at all. Replay on the bases, as well as fair/foul balls, home runs, and caught balls are what I would like to see. I understand the point of everything mattering in the NFL, but that is not a very sound point. The NFL has challenges all year, and contrary to you saying that one call can matter in the NFL but doesn't in MLB is insane. The ODDS of one call changing a season are less, due to the simple fact of more games, however, to say that one call cannot change a season is absolutely crazy. How about the 163 game? What happens when a team is kept out of the playoffs because of an incorrectly called play?

    ReplyDelete